<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Scott&#039;s Spiel &#187; admissions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scott-h.com/tag/admissions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scott-h.com</link>
	<description>The life of a Glasgow medical student, ?first aider, Mactard and slacking web developer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:40:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Moment of reflection</title>
		<link>http://www.scott-h.com/2009/05/18/moment-of-reflection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scott-h.com/2009/05/18/moment-of-reflection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 19:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uni]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[admissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coming around]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scott-h.com/?p=308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m now 1 paper down with 1 to go. Only 2 hours tomorrow, compared to the 3 today. How did it go? Well&#8230;
I think I&#8217;ll agree with the majority of people that it was quite a fair paper &#8211; nothing (much) was thrown in that was tricky. Personally though I don&#8217;t think it was brilliant, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m now 1 paper down with 1 to go. Only 2 hours tomorrow, compared to the 3 today. How did it go? Well&#8230;</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;ll agree with the majority of people that it was quite a fair paper &#8211; nothing (much) was thrown in that was tricky. Personally though I don&#8217;t think it was brilliant, there were quite a few topics that I ended up writing utter waffle about. Have I done myself justice? Probably not, I certainly didn&#8217;t feel it was the best exam I&#8217;ve sat as I looked back at the end.</p>
<p>After strolling around rather unimpressed with myself for a bit I found out I&#8217;ve been invited to join the admissons committee. This should be quite interesting. I offered to do it back in year 1 when it was a first come basis but I wasn&#8217;t fast enough. I&#8217;ll be keen to see what input I can have (if any).</p>
<p>Interestingly, speaking of things coming back around, the SRC IT co-ordinator job has been advertised again. This was something that caught my eye back in April 07(!). I went and applied for it and the process stretched until November before I was finally unsuccessful after interview. The fact it&#8217;s being advertised again suggests the person they found has also now left. Could I see this advertised again before I graduate? I haven&#8217;t applied this time, my name should be on file if they are really struggling!</p>
<p>Back to tomorrow I&#8217;m hoping to come out feeling happy with my attempt. Then I need to focus on the OSCE&#8230;whatever that is again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scott-h.com/2009/05/18/moment-of-reflection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Offers without interview: is it pushing it?</title>
		<link>http://www.scott-h.com/2009/03/14/offers-without-interview-is-it-pushing-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scott-h.com/2009/03/14/offers-without-interview-is-it-pushing-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 23:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uni]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[admissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controversial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scott-h.com/?p=277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m a self confessed observer of all things related to admission to medical school, particularly Glasgow. I don&#8217;t really know why, it just interests me. I&#8217;ve tried twice to get involved on the admissions committee but so far no luck. This year I&#8217;m giving around a 15 minute talk to those who are considering Glasgow [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a self confessed observer of all things related to admission to medical school, particularly Glasgow. I don&#8217;t really know why, it just interests me. I&#8217;ve tried twice to get involved on the admissions committee but so far no luck. This year I&#8217;m giving around a 15 minute talk to those who are considering Glasgow at the Applicant&#8217;s day at the end of the month.</p>
<p>The application process is quite a roller coaster for those on it. A very drawn out process that spans across 6 months of the year. Just last week it seems the bulk of this years Glasgow applicants has been given offers. Congrats to them!</p>
<p>However this year was rather different from last. A good deal of offers had already been given out &#8211; to those who hadn&#8217;t been interviewed.</p>
<p>This might not seem like a big change but personally I see it as quite significant.</p>
<p>As a bit of background, interview has long been the pass or fail criteria for Glasgow applicants. The introduction of the UKCAT seems to have changed this a bit. There is a progressive reliance on the UKCAT to rank candidates. I, thank goodness, didn&#8217;t have to take the UKCAT but those who have generally don&#8217;t appreciate the experience.</p>
<p>Whether or not the UKCAT is a good tool for applicants is beyond me. However I do believe that simply the best way to get the feel for an applicant is to speak to them. Isn&#8217;t this what they try and teach us all about in communication skills? It seems confusing that they are now dropping this as a prerequisite for an offer.</p>
<p>Beyond that I remember quite a bit of mockery from the Glasgow faculty regarding Edinburgh&#8217;s refusal to interview any school leavers (grads were a bit different). A bit of hypocrisy now, no?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve yet to ask about the reasoning behind this. Maybe a good reason exists. The rumour that the current chair of admissions is retiring seems a little more solid. Is the chair-to-be not so keen on interviews?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what kind of impact this will have on the ability of students. I mean this in no offence to those coming to us in September but I do look forward to seeing whether there are a bit different in a subtle sort of way. Will anyone be interviewed next yet? I hope so but it&#8217;s any one&#8217;s guess what will change next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scott-h.com/2009/03/14/offers-without-interview-is-it-pushing-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
